Gay Marriage and Bearing Fruit

I found out that Newsweek published an article today, talking about how the Bible doesn't really condemn homosexual marriage. Really? Well, no, not if you just rearrange things and ignore other things and completely remove everything from context and pretend it doesn't say what it says.

That is exactly what Lisa Miller did in her Newsweek article.

Ok, so if you read it, and you have also read the Bible, then it's pretty easy to see that this is a huge stretch at best. At worst, it is the media's attempt to promote gay marriage because of the embarrassing passing of Prop 8 in CA. We will see more and more of this filth and garbage, trying to rationalize homosexual "marriage" as ok, and morally wholesome. I have a few points to make. Sorry, LENGTHY points :D

First of all, lets look at the very first sin committed, way back in Genesis - From the Douay Rheims Bible, my personal favorite.

1:11 And he said: Let the earth bring forth the green herb, and such as may seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after its kind, which may have seed in itself upon the earth. And it was so done.

1:22 And he blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the waters of the sea: and let the birds be multiplied upon the earth.

1:27 And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. 28 And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it...

So, creation, is basicly rooted in Fruition. Fruition is meant to mean, offspring. People, trees, animals, insects and all manner of things are commanded to be "fruitful". To have offspring, and to fill up the earth.

So, is it too "literalist" to say He means what this says? May be what it really means is, "We will establish a rule in the first chapter that will render this entire writing false and thereby make a mockery of this scripture."

If God did not know what he wanted of us in the first chapter, then how can we follow His law? This is the same ploy as evolution: If God messed up the first book, then the rest isn't credable".

Well, being that God is all knowing, (I am surprised at how many people do not understand this concept) then he would know about this trash we just read and account for it. Well, he did, and to me it is very simple and clear. It is defined in the very start of the Bible in very clear and easy to understand terms. Let us go on a little farther and see where the creation story takes us and how it relates to homosexual acceptance/marriage.

1:31 And God saw all the things that he had made, and they were very good. And the evening and morning were the sixth day.

The end of Chapter one, and all was good- But that changes in Chapter 2 as we all know.

2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the slime of the earth: and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul.

(I just couldn't help myself) Does anyone else see, how God made man from mud and slime and breathed a soul into him? So, how can we call a newly concieved person "Just a blob of tissue". This is such a greater state of being than Adam, the very first man.

2:16 And he commanded him, saying: Of every tree of paradise thou shalt eat: 17 But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat. For in what day soever thou shalt eat of it, thou shalt die the death.

Ok, so we now have our FIRST rule, and what was this rule exactly? Was it literally to just not eat the fruit? Why fruit? What is the significance of fruit in this passage, and indeed in the whole work of scripture?

The first rule, given to us, by God was "Do not presume to know good, from evil." Sit down, shut up, and do what you are told. You can't decide good from evil, or know the difference, so God tried to keep us innocent.

2:21 Then the Lord God cast a deep sleep upon Adam: and when he was fast asleep, he took one of his ribs, and filled up flesh for it. 22 And the Lord God built the rib which he took from Adam into a woman: and brought her to Adam. 23 And Adam said: This now is bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man. 24 Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh. 25 And they were both naked: to wit, Adam and his wife: and were not ashamed.

So, if God wanted men and men and women and women to be fruitful, and he was all knowing, then he would have made them fruitful together. OR, really what this article is trying to say, is "The Bible is a backward, stupid way to live your life by". My question is, why on earth would I listen to someone with so little respect for the Bible on it's interpretation?

So, to sum up, God gave man woman so that they could be fruitful and fill the earth. If he wanted, accepted or embraced homosexual union in anyway, then he would have created men not man and women not woman. SO they could choose how they were "oriented" and to avoid confusion later, because God doesn't want us to be confused. So, the article basicly says, God isn't real, and He is not all knowing. The Bible is a bunch of hooey.

So we know that Eve meets the serpent (devil) and she is told -

3:4 And the serpent said to the woman: No, you shall not die the death. 5 For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.

So, now we go back to that same thing, the KNOWING of good and evil. But now, the serpent is STILL saying, We can choose, we can know, we can decide for ourselves what is right and wrong, according to society and culture. Forget the Bible, that's not true, it's a backward and anciently simplistic account of a world that no longer exists.

3:11 And he said to him: And who hath told thee that thou wast naked, but that thou hast eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat? 12 And Adam said: The woman, whom thou gavest me to be my companion, gave me of the tree, and I did eat. 13 And the Lord God said to the woman: Why hast thou done this? And she answered: The serpent deceived me, and I did eat. 14 And the Lord God said to the serpent: Because thou hast done this thing, thou art cursed among all cattle, and beasts of the earth: upon thy breast shalt thou go, and earth shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. 15 I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.

So, Adam and Eve were thrown out of paradise for presuming to understand and decide what was right and wrong? For presuming to "be as gods" and make up their own rules.

Homosexuality is not fruitful, it renders only purtid filth naturally in perversion, violence and disease. Dispite what they say, homosexual male communities are the only growing community of HIV and AIDS here in America. This is the fruit of their labors. Beware, the time is coming when they will get what they want, and our economy and lives will continue to worsen.

Abortion and homosexuality is the root of all the problems in our country/world. All of them, because if you do not uphold the first two directives of God, to respect life, and be fruitful, (in offspring and works of charity/love) the rest lays stagnant in you, bearing no fruits or good works.

When people are hungry, oppressed, out of work and really hurting, THEN they will suddenly get religious and when this country is back on it's knees, where it belongs, things will get better. So you better be prepared. Catholics pay attention, we should (and I am terribly guilty here) pray your rosary, Our Lady of Fatima warned us, we must pray much.

You can say the Bible is backward and unmodern, but really, in the first three chapters the arguments for gay marriage and abortion are ruined and denounced. Contact Newsweek, and let them know you will NOT fall for their lies. Read a more New Testament rebuttal here.

Politically Correct + No Free Speech

The movement of politically correct speech has in a way led to the current crisis of tongue tied Christians. In America, if you talk to harshly, condemning sin and admonishing sinners, well you're a bigot. Used to be we had this amendment right, (it was the first one, because our forefathers thought it was the most important one) but now, that is a thing of the past.

Now, if you express your opinion, and it isn't politically correct, you can go to jail. I believe we will see the time shortly where if you call someone a pervert because of their "sexual orientation" you will be jailed for hate speech. The perverts are howling over the passing of Prop 8 in CA. They are threatening people, boycotting companies and storming churches and interrupting services with perverse actions, throwing condoms and performing perverted acts on the pulpits....

Why isn't this on the news?

Well, it's all being kept very hush hush because we mustn't upset those people who have a different sexual orientation than the majority of America. We must all cow tow to the desires of a few freaky weirdos, because otherwise we aren't politically correct.

I for one, don't care anymore. I'm going to call it like I see it, and if the perverts want to do something about it, well they might not do so well with intimidation tactics out here in the woods where the red necks live.

One thing I'll say for red necks, we aint that edicated, but we knows what is right, and what aint. Alternative sexual oreintation is a sin. It is wrong, and we are all wrong if we don't grow some backbone and start proclaiming the gosphel!

God made woman for man. He didn't make man, then make another man, then say, well maybe they might change their mind, and make a woman, and then make another woman in case she didn't like the men....One man, one woman.

Until we, as a group get off our duffs and start talking about this, it will get worse and worse. The acceptance these people wish is an abomination to even consider. Their lifestyle is an abomination. Their practices are foul, filthy, destructive, sinful, and perverted. They say "But we were born this way" So what? If pedophiles say they are born that way should we just push our little girls and boys at them and give them our blessing? It's no different and it is just as sinful.

"Traditional" Marriage? What a crock of whooey!

Marriage, is and always will be one man, and one woman. Not two men and one woman, not one woman and another woman. Not three women and a man, nor two men and their dog (no I'm not kidding there are people lobbying for it). One man, one woman.

Christian tradition tells us that when a MAN and a WOMAN come together, and have a sincere desire to marry, forever joining themselves and cutting their ties from the past, then God comes, and he creates a marriage, joining two into one. GOD makes a marriage, a sacred sacrament of the most holy and venerable Christain tradition. This idea of same sex couples wanting to be called married is blasphemous. It is wrong, and it mocks God. God will never create a holy union in an unholy vice filled cess pool of perversion that is called "same sex union".

Will we stand by, muttering and scratching our toes in the dust? Do we wish to avoid confrontation? Will we keep silent until we are sent to jail for condemning it?

Take a trip to Canada, where preachers and preists are jailed for condemning homosexual perversion on the pulpit and tell me I'm paranoid. Oh but our media would never hide it from us would they? Believe it, it's true.

If we don't wake up and start smelling the brimstone, it will be too late for our grand country, and for our souls too. If you don't speak out against it, then you appear to agree with it. The mock us, and we stand by idle, they mock our God and we stand by idol. WAKE UP! You are not a tree! Stop standing around and start talking, start standing up for your faith, your God and your country.

America, America, God shed his grace on thee...

The Sickening Truth About the World Today

Did you know, that good, and evil have no definition anymore? What was wrong yesterday, can be right today, it's all changeable and easy - just change the definition of right and wrong.

Churches are slowly changing their "rules" to match the new agenda of the world today. Episcopalians are appointing gay bishops, and performing gay marriages.

Ok, fine I can see this with some whacked out thing like Wicca, but really, where do they get this crap?

Catholics (I mean real ones, that still follow the leadership of the Pope, you know, the one in ROME) believe in the bible, and also in the tradition and teachings of the Church. Did you know, that until 1930 ALL christian churches condemned contraception in all its forms?

But suddenly, one day, the Lambeth Conference in 1930 by the church of England decided that indeed artificial birth control could be used when abstinence was unpractical. This is the first diveation from any bible following church. Disregarding thousands of years of tradition, all the way back to Jewish law, the Chuch of England decided that was wrong for all those years, was suddenly, ok now. By 1931 almost all the churches had followed, excepting a few, and Catholics were one of these.

So, something was wrong ( a sin) one day, and right(no longer a sin) the next day and thus the slippery slope of contraception leads us to mass murder of the unborn today. It is no secret that the selfish nature of contraception leads to abortion and other forms of evil.

Contraception is selfish, because it is saying that for convienence of the parents, offspring are limited. Economic, or other reasons can be a valid reason for limiting births, but one shouldn't be using artifical means....The Catholic Church and a few others, still stand behind this belief.

So, if you use the marital embrace, and artifical contraception, then basicly it's like eating and then going and barfing it up later. That would be gluttony, because it removes the act of eating from nutrition, and makes it only pleasure. Eating is for nutrition, and also is pleasurable. If you only eat for pleasure then you have a problem, and it becomes a sin.

If you only use the maritail embrace for pleasure, and are unwilling to accept the results of that action, then you reject God's plan, and instead embrace the ideology of "I". Our society embraces "I" above all else. Look out for number one, and forget the rest.

We have a new President that considers children a "punishment". So, it follows that his own children are punishment. How sad for them. They are fortunate that they came at a convienent time for their parents, otherwise they would have been prevented or aborted.

So, we now have a president who embraces the culture of "I" and also the ideology of the gay agenda. We have someone leading us who sanctions infanticide, pedophilia (more on this another day) and all manner of obscenity, homosexuality, gay "marriage" and much much more. If he has his way, all limits and information on abortions will be abolished. Women will be coerced and given abortions without being informed of what it is they are doing. Actually this already happens, but it will get much worse. The Freedom of Choice Act is at the top of his agenda, and yet, nobody knows what it is, or what it does.

63 million people voted for Obama, and the only reason he won was because 50 million people killed by abortion since it was legalized didn't get to vote, and the people who could have thought of them, were more concerned with putting a dollar in their own pockets. How lovely. Christian people, supposedly who now are responsible for this President who will lead us into mass murder in record numbers, gay perversions and all manners of sexual gratifications....yes even pedafilia...

Today, it is wrong, but tomorrow after the "change we need" it will be ok....

oh wait, too late. It's all already ok.

Obama is a great Civil rights leader right? Our first black president, wait isn't that COOL? Well maybe if you condone eugenics and genocide..

WHAT??? Yep, it's all there int he history books, but not on the news.

"The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics." Margeret Sanger

Planned Parenthood, was founded by Margeret Sanger. She started the organization to eliminate the "unfit". The disabled, and the BLACKS to name a few.

Oh, but you will say, that isn't the goal of Planned Parenthood now, no, now they just provide a sevice. A service to the POOR and to the BLACKS....no it couldn't possibly be eugenic in nature.

Where are all the Down Syndrome babies?

Why are almost half of the pregnancies in Black women in the US ending in abortion?

Why are 78% of their total clinics in minority neighborhoods?

Why is the black population in decline if they are not being targeted for genocide?

Obama advocates and supports exterminating his own people. Well, why is that surprising when he considers his own grandchildren punishment, and said he would want them aborted rather than be bothered with their existance?

Some intersting links -

http://www.blackgenocide.org/planned.html

http://www.ldi.org/DeathCamps/Holocaust6.cfm

Its time to prepare for battle, and God willing we will win, because the Nazi's had nothing on this man.

"A few bishops have said Biden should not receive Holy Communion.

But Bishop W. Francis Malooly of Wilmington, Del., Biden's home diocese, said the Democrat had called him in September, the night before Malooly was installed as bishop.

Malooly said the two agreed they would meet when scheduling allows to discuss Catholic teaching. The bishop said he did not advise Biden to refrain from Communion.

"I won't politicize the Eucharist," Malooly said. "I don't want to alienate people. I want to change their hearts and minds."

As a Catholic, I find this sickening and disturbing.

What is wrong with these Bishops?

Point one: It's a mortal sin to support abortion, for any reason at any time at all. Period, close the book.

Point 2: You cannot recieve the Eucarist while you are in mortal sin. Period, close the book, you MUST repent, go to confession and do your penance. THEN you can have communion.

But apparently Malooly missed that point. Perhaps he was absent that day on Bishop 101 class.

My question is, why should the church "bend" the rules to fit the new ideology? Why is that right?

Why should we shape God, and his laws and change them to suit our own warped society?

That is what is going on here....

Read more Extreme right propaganda here.

Let us be Catholic, or let us NOT be Catholic, but let the pretend Catholics go join some other church that conforms to their new ideology that is based on our new Obamanation.

A Bitter Bitter Pill

Wake up and smell reality, the stench of garbage or, something worse. At any rate, I am bitter, even though I knew darned well he would win. BUT that being said, he won, so he does deserve the respect of his post, and I will give him that. However, I still don't agree with him, and I still don't think he's going to change us in a way that is good.

But, I would guess that our whole country is going to begin moving slowly towards a more "gay friendly" country. President to be Obama has promised to support and promote the gay agenda, granting them special rights (that they already have) to protect them. See, it's already illegal to assault someone, but they want it labeled as a "hate crime".

Is it me, or is there a correlation? No, no it's just coincidence, not a depiction mocking the last supper. NO, we're just being overly sensitive. Becuase you know, they wouldn't ever do anything that would mock our Lord. They show themselves, in more ways than one here. Not all gays would approve, but I sure don't hear any protesting either. Sad really.

But, I would guess that our whole country is going to begin moving slowly towards a more "gay friendly" country. President to be Obama has promised to support and promote the gay agenda, granting them special rights (more than they already have, or that we have) to protect them. See, it's already illegal to assault someone, but they want it labeled as a "hate crime".

Well, what this would mean, is that if a gay person was in a fight for example, and the other person wasn't gay, and maybe had a reputation for not approving of gays, they would then get a heavier, more severe sentence. They would also get labeled as someone to watch for further "hate crimes". Even if it wasn't related to that persons perverse behavior.

You see, it's sort of an endangered species sort of thing. Like if a good ol' redneck around here shot a deer out of season, well, they might be fined and all. If they shot a alligator snapping turtle, then they would get a much stiffer sentence and fine because they are endangered.

You see, there aren't as many homosexuals in the US, as regular heterosexual folks, so they need EXTRA protecting. The real irony of this is, that they generally are the "evolution" believers and so I wonder, why not just let evolution take care of this, and let the strongest survive? Survival of the fittest and all.

Oh wait, they can't procreate so they have to "preserve" themselves with legislation, and indoctrinating, by adopting children and raising them to be gay. You know, it's interesting, because Rome fell because of this, at least in part. They quit procreating, and they lost population, and couldn't keep the army full, and so the edges started collapsing. hmmm, makes that whole fence/immigration thing a little more interesting to contemplate....

Because Prop 8 passed, (in CA, defining marriage as a man and woman only)they (some of the gays)are now threatening Mormons and Catholics, in particular, with burning churches and houses. In all seriousness, we need to pray about this. Especially for the christians who could be in danger...

But, you know, it isn't threatening, it's just them, "venting" their disappointment and being angry at the passing of the proposition. If it were the reverse, Christians talking about burning and such, well, we'de be on a list at the local police station.

Equality, or rather preferential treatment. Seems they already got it, but it just aint enough.

Prayer and Fasting

Many of us, have done prayer and fasting for a Pro Life president. Please take time today, the most important of days to voice your concerns over pro abortion canadates to some friends/co workers, or anyone you can approach.

Your voice, although one voice can change the minds of hundreds, with the grace of God.

May PEACE be with us all and the war on the unborn come to an end quickly.

+JMJ+

Obama, Kevin Jennings and GSLEN

The bad, the worse and the terrible.

I read an article by Linda Harvey today, read it here. It discusses the background of Kevin Jennings, the campaign fundraising co-chairman of Sen Obama's “LGBT” community, or Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender community.

Kevin Jennings, and the organization he founded, GSLEN appears to have a very casual and passive opinion on sexual relations between adults and teens, even children.

"One Teacher in Ten, GLSEN founder Kevin Jennings reported the story of a 15-year-old boy named "Brewster" who came to him in 1989 for assistance. Jennings said the boy was having difficulty in school and did not know why. However, during a speech in Iowa five years ago, Jennings stated that "Brewster" had confided to him that he had a sexual encounter with an older man in Boston. Jennings claims he responded to the teen by saying, "I hope you knew to use a condom." The apparent case of sex abuse was not reported to authorities."(site here)

Apparently Jennings doesn't find that to be disturbing in the least, as long as a condom was used. That's all that matters right? Not that a child was sexually abused by an adult. Who cares right? More pedifilia accounts in literature reportedly directed at teens and children by this type of group-

"The book "Growing Up Gay/Growing Up Lesbian," recommended on the GLSEN website for kids in grades seven to 12, describes two 10-year-old boys in a very graphic sexual encounter (pp.99-100). In the same book, an adult man named Eliot reflects on his youth:

"My first experience was with a much older man, a friend of Derek's [his father]. ... When I was 15, he must have been 29, 30 ... I seduced him. ... It was a wild night. We did everything."

Is anyone listening? He was 15! What kind of weirdo is this? A 30 year old, seduced by a 15 year old? He's been so warped, that he actually BELIEVES 15 year olds can seduce dirty old men.

"Rainbow Boys," features an episode of homosexual sex between one of the main characters, a 17-year-old boy, and a 29-year-old man he has just met via the Internet ( p. 148). Again, a great influence for kids.

"My sexuality is as fluid, infinite, undefinable, and ever-changing as the north-flowing river. ... Sexuality is not black or white ... it is gray. ... I know that defining myself is not so simple. ..." writes a 16-year-old in "Revolutionary Voices : A Multicultural Queer Youth Anthology" (p.167).

Another girl writes in the same book: "I am a 15-year-old dyke artist and activist. I've got flaming pink hair and a passion for genderf–k in both directions" (p. 28).

I had a hard time finding them, but here they are, offered on the GSLEN website.

I'm sorry, but this is sick, disgusting and filthy. It isn't anything like the marital embrace given to us by God. It is a disgrace.

Obama indorses this organization, and has it's founder in his employment. Do you really think it's about making school "safe" or about warping our childrens minds? Do you really think it's about equality, or about making more gays?

Come on, everyone is doing it....these books are suggested for grades 7 - 12.